<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Amsterdamize  - Latest Comments in NL In Teh 50&amp;#8217;s</title><link>http://amsterdamize.disqus.com/</link><description>Just an Amsterdam native who won’t take his city and its cycling extravaganza for granted anymore, thinking these posts might be clues for others, inspiration perhaps, if you will.</description><atom:link href="https://amsterdamize.disqus.com/nl_in_teh_508217s/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:46:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: NL In Teh 50&amp;#8217;s</title><link>http://www.amsterdamize.com/2009/10/27/nl-in-teh-50s/#comment-21491662</link><description>&lt;p&gt;and we (Dutch) still do, Toni :), it's just that 'Cycle Chic' isn't about 'chic', it's about just hopping on, whatever you're wearing, as cycling is not complicated, far far less than it's made out to be by the industry that tries to sell you stuff ('gear'). A lot of countries have lost touch with the normalcy in cycling along the way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">amsterdamize</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:46:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NL In Teh 50&amp;#8217;s</title><link>http://www.amsterdamize.com/2009/10/27/nl-in-teh-50s/#comment-21330605</link><description>&lt;p&gt;EVERYBODY cycled chic in those days!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ToniRose</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:43:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NL In Teh 50&amp;#8217;s</title><link>http://www.amsterdamize.com/2009/10/27/nl-in-teh-50s/#comment-21164150</link><description>&lt;p&gt;thanks for that macfred, I noticed your plug in my stats early on, so much traffic! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">amsterdamize</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 05:02:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NL In Teh 50&amp;#8217;s</title><link>http://www.amsterdamize.com/2009/10/27/nl-in-teh-50s/#comment-21164134</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you'd be surprised how many, Wilma, I would too :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">amsterdamize</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 05:01:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NL In Teh 50&amp;#8217;s</title><link>http://www.amsterdamize.com/2009/10/27/nl-in-teh-50s/#comment-21164105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;now now, Frits, that's a bit cynical isn't it? I know post-war economic growth has eluded us on many fronts. And sure, the last few decades people's decision-making process has been steered by policy measures that range from economic ones to urban design, but shouldn't we applaud the fact that we've come to a place where nobody thinks less of it, people actually enjoy riding and that this is still growing? Last year 12,5% more people cycled to the train station and since 2007 there have been more bike than car movements in the Amsterdam. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">amsterdamize</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 05:00:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NL In Teh 50&amp;#8217;s</title><link>http://www.amsterdamize.com/2009/10/27/nl-in-teh-50s/#comment-21162194</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The current cycling rates in NL still haven't reached pre-decline periods.&lt;br&gt;See Making Cycling Irresistible: &lt;a href="http://policy.rutgers.edu/faculty/pucher/Irresistible.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://policy.rutgers.edu/faculty/pucher/Irresistible.pdf"&gt;http://policy.rutgers.edu/f...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steven Vance</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:10:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NL In Teh 50&amp;#8217;s</title><link>http://www.amsterdamize.com/2009/10/27/nl-in-teh-50s/#comment-21119226</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gotta love the empty, perfect road with the "Cyclists must use the cycle path" sign. It is worth remembering that, just as this document was being filmed, the bicycle ridership in the Netherlands was starting its free fall that didn't pick up (a little) until the first oil crisis in the seventies.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Txarli</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:38:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NL In Teh 50&amp;#8217;s</title><link>http://www.amsterdamize.com/2009/10/27/nl-in-teh-50s/#comment-21104791</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fabulous! I love all the beautiful dresses, and the suits and ties. I wonder how many of those bikes are still in use today! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wilma</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:19:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NL In Teh 50&amp;#8217;s</title><link>http://www.amsterdamize.com/2009/10/27/nl-in-teh-50s/#comment-21094549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"so, what other reasons could there be?" Easy, there was no choice. The essential difference between then and now is that in the fifties people dreamed of cars but couldn't afford them yet. Given the chance, they would all happily ditch their bikes and start washing their cars on Saturdays. I know, I grew up in those days and have seen it happen. Nowadays, people return to using their bikes as there are too many cars around for the space available. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frits</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:50:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: NL In Teh 50&amp;#8217;s</title><link>http://www.amsterdamize.com/2009/10/27/nl-in-teh-50s/#comment-21092703</link><description>&lt;p&gt;happy to, macfred! And uhm, Utopia starts anywhere, right?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">amsterdamize</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:17:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>